This opens a space that seems to present some fruitful points for discussion. For example how and when digital media is or can be consumed/experienced in relation to its digital copies, and how media could be valued in terms of its ‘experience’ rather than its existence.
A shame that this potential productive space seems here to get flushed down the toilet of art, performance, media and journalism, etc. without being addressed.
Urg. ‘Art’.
This opens a space that seems to present some fruitful points for discussion. For example how and when digital media is or can be consumed/experienced in relation to its digital copies, and how media could be valued in terms of its ‘experience’ rather than its existence.
A shame that this potential productive space seems here to get flushed down the toilet of art, performance, media and journalism, etc. without being addressed.
I’m not sure I understand your complaint. Art can and does inspire productive discussion. Why is this being called art a problem?