1. 1
  1.  

  2. 1

    This is kind of a trash article that I prefer not to see.

    1. 3

      I will be more selective next time on Lobsters, thanks for calling it out as the article does read like a tabloid. . .

      I submitted this hoping to get some opinions from people more familiar with the quantum computing field if this achievement had any significance. Saw that the article was not as formidable as I had initially thought… only then did I realize that I cannot remove my own submission.

      1. 1

        It was kind of puzzle to figure out what they were actually reporting on, but I believe this is not about quantum computation - it’s still a scientific advance but not relevant to qubit count.