1. 5
  1.  

  2. 3

    Not sure why the IA link is used; direct link works fine…

    This covers a lot of prior art I noticed a lot of papers on tagged memory ignore - table 1 is in particular a mostly good summary. The glaring omission is, as you would expect me to point out - IBM i and its predecessors.

    1. 2

      Indeed, it’s a very strange omission.

      Those who found this paper interesting might like my writeup on how IBM i tagging works: https://www.devever.net/~hl/ppcas

      1. 1

        Nice write up. Thx

        Btw - are there any recent PowerPC boards in the $100 - $200 range for hobbyists?

        The only thing I could imagine is maybe using an old Power Mac G5. But those have issues with their liquid cooling systems.

        1. 1

          No, and definitely not with the tags extension. The only CPUs that ever supported that are the IBM POWER series.

          1. 1

            Ah, oh well. Thx

      2. 1

        Because it was the PDF Google Scholar surfaced. Glad that the publisher put out a free version!