1. -2
  1.  

  2. 5

    This is a silly conjecture / op-ed / gimmick article with no citations. Off-topic for here in my humble opinion. :-)

    1. 3

      The moral of the story? You can’t hide on the internet anymore. Your sentence structure and word use is MORE unique than your own fingerprint. If an organization, like the NSA, wants to find you they will.

      I can’t change my fingerprint, at least not without some painful self-mutilation. I can change my writing style whenever I’m logged in to my troll accounts. And as the linked github project hints, it oughtn’t be too hard to use a program to normalise one’s writing style.

        1. 1

          Maybe some kind of translator from english to globish could help. Translation from more complex language structures to the simpler ones, so fingerprints of your own language will be lost.

          1. 1

            Google translate, and back again. If this post is correct, it was the usage of 50 words. So, really, you need a thesaurus integrated into your writing setup to vary adjectives and adverbs and such, too.

        2. 1

          I heard they identified him by analyzing all the Facebook ads people were shown and reverse engineering the ad suggestions to identify the sounds recorded by his phone’s microphone.

          1. 1

            Looked for any text or vocal occurance of word Bitcoin or phrase cryptocurrency before he first published Bitcoin. Alternatively, IP’s of his posts and the original transactions with them QUANTUMing every one until one of the keyloggers found “bitcoin.” Thought hard about using Intel backdoor but knew Bitcoin wouldn’t go anywhere. Not worth risk of disclosure.

            They probably copied his coins while they were at it for use as leverage later. Then, a lucky break happened for that tean’s management when Chinese got all over Bitcoin. Leverage went from the usual crypto nerd to rich people in a competing superpower. Realizing this, Satoshi went underground.

            1. 3

              Tedu was making a snarky connection to another recent similarly terrible article.

              1. 1

                Oh ok.