1. 16
  1.  

  2. 5

    The postage stamp space reserved for content on mobile was immediately covered by a pop up asking me to bookmark the site. Unreadable.

    1. 4

      Its sad to see the classic Firefox addons go… IIRC WebExtensions have much more limited possibilities.

      1. 3

        The big problem is XUL extensions are a dead end - they make sandboxing and multiprocess much harder, if not impossible. I do think they should get WebExtensions near API parity though, before killing off the old model.

      2. 4

        Amazing how Mozilla marches Firefox to it’s own death. Just more horrible interface options and zero creativity except to mimic Chrome.

        1. 15

          Care to elaborate? Which of the interface decisions would you describe as “horrible”?

          1. 3

            The cartoon characters are unappealing. I realize this is a subjective opinion, regarding taste, but for a utility to adopt a mascot, or anthropomorphic-character-oriented motif, very careful consideration must be given to the degree of “cutesiness” expressed.

            Compare the Plan 9 bunny:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_9_from_Bell_Labs

            To Microsoft’s Clippy:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Assistant

            Viewed repeatedly, one takes on a sense of irritating condescension while the other does not.

          2. 8

            I lost count of how many times a “death march” for Firefox was called.

          3. 2

            I really like having a separate search box next to the address bar.

            1. 2

              The UI is customizeable, so I think you can drag back a search box from the widget pane.

            2. 2

              Wow, that website is absolutely terrible on mobile. Why even have the viewport meta tag in your HTML if you’re going to not work at all on small screens?

              1. 2

                YMMV, but it works nicely with Firefox (mobile) and ublock. :)