1. 3

  2. 1

    Interesting that this is tagged ‘philosophy’.

    I don’t disagree with the sentiment; I’m a big fan of “small pieces, loosely joined” but this post i spretty skimpy.

    1. 1

      Yeah, there’s a lot of things tagged as such that aren’t actually philosophy. /r/philosophy suffers from this as well. I personally just don’t upvote them.

      1. 1

        This may be a good (or at least reasonable) fit for “philosophy” (i.e. the philosophy of building with composability in mind or something). It’s just disappointing that the article then doesn’t have much to say about it.