The lawsplaining guy is an attorney with a podcast in which he basically reads through various lawsuits word for word and explains what’s going on in layman’s terms. He analyzes the text purely from a legal perspective, not from a political perspective. This is the first of several episodes in which he reads through Damore v. Google.
Can somebody explain why is this offtopic or spam?
[edit] I get it.
What’d you get?
This guy’s position on the topic is clearly voiced several times through the podcast.
I personally disagree with it and don’t really want it do be voiced on lobsters frontpage. I think it makes the community less welcoming.
However, I ended up watching the entire podcast, it is actually a good technical overview of the problem, political position taken appart… I upvoted it, it doesn’t deserve a negative score.
Anyways, what I get is that some people are abusing flags to express disagreement instead of commenting for quite some time now; and it’s not something that gonna change anytime soon if no action is taken. Thus asking for explanation is vain.
Sorry to hear that. Abuse of flagging on comments is something I’ve grumped about extensively.
I flagged it as off-topic for being only tech-related at two or even 3 removes.
Suggest
jobandpracticestags since this covers a law issues about job practices.