1. 20

This is the resolution (upon expiry of a gag order) to the canary-not-updated mystery that was discussed here a few months ago.

  1.  

  2. [Comment removed by author]

    1. 2

      has explicitly said their systems are fully under control when that is obviously not the case

      Please expand on “obviously not the case”

      1. [Comment removed by author]

        1. 2

          I disagree. They claim they never gave law enforcement access to their systems and that they were not forced to hand over their systems or install anything on them. They were in full control then. Giving up data is not the same as relinquishing control of your servers/networks.