1. 1

  2. 2

    I really, really dislike the first image. I hate the trendy idea that functional is what’s “next” or inherently “better”. if anything it’s older than most paradigms. That said, the actual text content is fine and useful, so I consider it a nitpick.

    1. 2

      I had a very similar reaction.

      Functional programming is very cool for some things, but sucks rocks at others. OOP programming, ditto.

      1. 1

        Yeah, it’s really much more like a genealogical tree where OOP is its own branch that hopefully ends soon. ;)

      2. 1

        It starts off pretty lame, but gets better as you progress through the series. It also talks about Elm a bit, which is nice.