1. 11
  1.  

  2. 5

    Great news for “Real Programmers”!

    1. 1

      A classic!

    2. 2

      Is there any context for why C++17 is discouraged for a C++ compiler that supports C++17? I feel as if I’m missing something.

      1. 3

        LLVM and clang are separate. This way, it would be possible to just have f18 and llvm, but no clang anywhere.

        1. 1

          Oh, that makes total sense. Thank you! I was wondering if there was an implicit comment about C++17 support in clang or something.

      2. 1

        new name for the project (e.g. flang or simply fortran)

        Wait, there’s already a flang!?

        1. 2

          If you visit https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18, you read, “F18 is a front-end for Fortran intended to replace the existing front-end in the Flang compiler”.