1. 10

  2. 9

    My shell does automatically show a notification, if a command ran longer than 10 seconds and the terminal does not have focus. No need to remember to add a command.

    1. 2

      What do you use for that?

      1. 7

        My self made fish config: https://github.com/qznc/dot/blob/master/config/fish/config.fish#L58

        For bash and zsh, search for “undistract me: https://github.com/jml/undistract-me

    2. 4

      why not use

      $ some –command; osascript -e ‘display notification “Done!!” with title “Done!”’

      on your mac? (there are equivalents for gnome, kde, X etc.)

      1. 6

        This is actually superior because, I’m guessing, aa probably won’t work with things like shell aliases, so simply using the shell to run your alert after the command finishes is a better option.

        1. 2

          Good point! I forgot about shell aliases. I opened an issue to track adding support for that:


          1. 1

            One option would be to just always run the command through the user’s shell. Yours isn’t the only otherwise-cool utility that doesn’t work on aliases. I recently found https://github.com/chneukirchen/nq and was super stoked until I realized it barfed on aliases. I may submit a PR to support that if I find time.

            How do you like Rust? I haven’t found enough time or motivation to wrap my tiny brain around it yet :-(

        2. 3

          I don’t think alert-after actually does this yet, but one advantage of using a wrapper is that it can check the exit status and automatically give you a success/failure notification. You could do that in shell too, but it’d be much more tedious to write out by hand every time.

          1. 5
            some --command && osascript -e 'display notification "Success!!"' || osascript -e 'display notification "Failure!!"'

            Not awful.

            1. 1

              If you simply want to notify with the exit code you can use $? which is bound the exit code of the previous process, e.g.

              bash -c "exit 0";  echo Status: $?
              1. 0

                A 101-character suffix on a command, versus the OP’s 2-character prefix on a command? Yes, I’d call that “much more tedious”.

                (it would be pretty easy to turn your command into a shell-script wrapper with a two-character name, but that’s just an argument about implementation, not about whether a wrapper is a good design)

              2. 4

                sure, but it could be a 5 line shell script

                1. 1

                  shell has functions and aliases that you can add to your profile.

                2. 1

                  I use zenity on Linux for this exact purpose