1. 7
  1.  

  2. 3

    More info on the construct here: http://keccak.noekeon.org/

    1. 2

      I hope this isn’t the one with the creepy-sounding NSA backdoor?

      1. 2

        Presumably you are talking about the discussion five years ago about a potential backdoor in a psuedo-random number generator that no was was going to use [0], which has recently made the rounds again on HN.

        If that’s the case, don’t worry. The same guy said this SHA-3 hash function is a good one [1].

        [0] https://www.schneier.com/essay-198.html

        [1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/10/keccak_is_sha-3.html