Don’t get me wrong here, the author certainly isn’t wrong, I just don’t see the point of the article. I expected the article to launch into an exploration of how we could fix this without losing legacy support but instead the article just ended.
Yeah, seriously. There’s no need to shout your bug report into the void… take it to vim-dev@vim.org where it belongs.
Don’t get me wrong here, the author certainly isn’t wrong, I just don’t see the point of the article. I expected the article to launch into an exploration of how we could fix this without losing legacy support but instead the article just ended.
Yeah, seriously. There’s no need to shout your bug report into the void… take it to vim-dev@vim.org where it belongs.