1. 13
  1. 3

    I think that CGO is implicitly enabled when using networking stuff in Go programs, but I might be misremembering something.

    1. 1

      You need it for non-sucking getaddrinfo() on Linux, it enables NSS modules.

    2. 2

      I have fond memories of using ELF interpreter settings so that .NET apps would just directly invoke Mono. I’m pretty sure I did the same for Java at some point. It’s a bit of a trip seeing that Alpine gets along without basic dynamic linking, though.

      1. 1

        That leveraged binfmt_misc, I think? Java in a Debian still set that up to this day. My little Java app (wadc) has a /usr/bin/wadc that is literally a JAR file.

      2. 1

        It is incredibly annoying that running an executable whose dynamic dependency is missing can emit just “file not found” with no extra useful information. I’ve ended up scratching my head over this a few times before I learned the pattern. Why doesn’t the dynamic linker just print out the name of the missing library?!

        1. 2

          If it is just a missing library, that’s exactly what happens (libfoo.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory).

          The case discussed here, though, is where the missing piece is the dynamic linker itself (ld.so), which is a trickier problem, because what’s going to do the printing? The execve call itself fails (whereas with a missing library execve succeeds but the newly-running program then fails), so it’s up to whatever program called execve to detect that and report the error. The failure mode in question is in fact due a missing file, so ENOENT is what the kernel returns, and hence what the caller will probably print. I suppose you could try to get a specialized EBADINTERP errno code or something for this particular case of a missing or otherwise unusable interpreter added to the kernel/libc/POSIX, but with what currently exists I don’t see an easy solution.

          1. 1

            I managed to discover the circumstances under which I had the problem: attempting to run a 32-bit executable on a 64-bit system when some libraries are missing, e.g.:

            % ./cabal  
            zsh: no such file or directory: ./cabal
            % ldd ./cabal
                    linux-gate.so.1 (0xf7fa4000)
                    libz.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0xf7f61000)
                    libgmp.so.10 => not found
                    libc.musl-x86.so.1 => not found
                    libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0xf7d78000)
                    /lib/ld-musl-i386.so.1 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf7fa6000)
          2. 0

            You can get a significant amount of information out of the linux dynamic linker using some of the available debug environment variables. See: https://linux.die.net/man/8/ld-linux

            For example:

            export LD_DEBUG=all

            Will give you more information than you know what to do with :)

            That being said, the case being discussed here could certainly use some better error reporting!

            1. 1

              Doesn’t help in this case unfortunately:

              % LD_DEBUG=all ./cabal    
              zsh: no such file or directory: ./cabal
          3. 1

            I love seeing these posts about things that are just second-nature to me, and yet some new individual has just learned what is going on under the covers!