1. 3
  1. 1

    I have two thoughts about this:

    First, I wonder if this is what the Signal subpoena was about.

    Second, it looks like this might have been another interesting whistleblower incident, especially considering the documents are supposed to be from 2014 and:

    the documents could contain “highly classified computer codes developed to hack into the networks of foreign governments.”

    Of course the loose language could just be used in order to drum up support for the prosecution.