We literally do this at my work, we just never actually wrote down what we were doing. Amazing
This is obviously a joke, but more often than not, it feels like it
I feel that if you seriously value backwards compatibility you might actually use, in a similar vein, SHAME.pride.shame!
I’m going to start interpreting all versions that I see as if ther were pride-versioned.
There’s sure a lot of rust libraries whose maintainers are deeply ashamed of their work!
/s
I was going to say. Aren’t most Rust projects pride versioned?
Just a joke, but still works better than some serious attempts :-)
Added to awesome-versioning!
awesome-versioning
We literally do this at my work, we just never actually wrote down what we were doing. Amazing
This is obviously a joke, but more often than not, it feels like it
I feel that if you seriously value backwards compatibility you might actually use, in a similar vein, SHAME.pride.shame!
I’m going to start interpreting all versions that I see as if ther were pride-versioned.
There’s sure a lot of rust libraries whose maintainers are deeply ashamed of their work!
/s
I was going to say. Aren’t most Rust projects pride versioned?
Just a joke, but still works better than some serious attempts :-)
Added to
awesome-versioning!