1. 6
  1.  

  2. 1

    Much less dire than the initial headline makes it sound after the errata:

    Correction – these chips are on server motherboards, not on PCs or other consumer devices.

    I believe the same security-minded arguments made against these BMCs referred to in the article can be made for Intel AMT as well (which is much more pervasive, and can exist on consumer chips/machines!):

    You can’t control it. You can’t patch it. It can completely control your computer’s hardware and software. And its purpose is remote monitoring.

    1. 1

      Yes, Intel AMT is horrible. At some point some malware will try to turn that to be able to keep a backdoor open in case the OS gets reinstalled.