1. 4
  1.  

  2. 1

    Also interesting: JEP 369: Migrate to GitHub. Nice that one of the goals is “ensure that OpenJDK Community can always move to a different source-code hosting provider”.

    1. 5

      Oh, that’s even more interesting. Too bad the heavy use of GitHub API can quickly result in vendor lock-in where you cannot migrate easily. I don’t have any complains about the API itself but it’s sad that even if we have a distributed version control system it cannot be used without a collection of proprietary services.

      1. 4

        Lock-in is true no matter what though. The moment you go farther than plain git hosting, you will take on dependencies which will cause you trouble.

        Even with a self-hosted solution you will eventually get into trouble keeping up to date as OSes go out of support and/or security patches dry up.

        As long as you have a valid migration plan up your sleeve, github is as good or bad as any other third-party solution and arguably so much more convenient and time-saving compared to a first-party solution that the trade-offs are still worth it.

        You’d rather have a PR review system that works well, is available now and is known to many users than multiple months of development to end up with an inferior solution that will lack user engagement and binds resources not available in other places - a solution which you might have to throw away anyways a few years down the road because the platform you have chosen went out of support or doesn’t run on supported OSes.

        Yes. You don’t have control over githubs roadmap. But compare the self-hosted landscape from 2007 when github launched to what is best-practice and available now, 13 years later. And then compare the effort you would have gone through to keep up with those dependencies to what it would have taken you to keep up with github.

        Github is the more stable platform. And they have a lot of incentive to keep it that way.

        Yes, I would love if free and open platforms could be as feature-ful, accepted by users and easy to maintain, but they aren’t and thus at least for now, the positives for the project and thus for its users and developers do outweigh the drawbacks. And with every passing year, the trust put onto github by it’s users only increases.

        1. 2

          Thank you for your insight Glenn!

        2. 4

          If only it were legal to reimplement an API…

          1. 3

            @ianloic I chuckled loudly when I read this. 😂