1. 15
  1.  

  2. 10

    I’m not a big fan of these “fire people” type of articles. I suppose this might be a bit tongue-in-cheek but it still implies employees are disposable and that there aren’t other solutions to problem members of staff like retraining or changing company policy.

    Also not a big fan of DHH’s contrarian, all-or-nothing bloviating that seems to pass as “thought leadership”.

    1. 4

      The title was a reaction to Jason Calacanus' statement: “Fire people who are not workaholics”.

      1. 4

        I read “fire” as “don’t hire.”

        1. 4

          Alternative title: “Workaholics considered harmful”.