1. 9
  1. 4

    An interesting problem, but I imagine as with anything it means close to nothing until the first court cases have rulings.

    1. 4

      The best known is probably the clause in the Affero GPL (or AGPL) that requires that users interacting with covered code over a network be able to download the source code

      This is a restriction on distribution. The Affero GPL is basically identical to the GPL but with ‘distribution’ changed to ‘propagation’ where ‘propagation’ includes hosting the programme on a public-facing network. The idea is that ‘server’ software is being conveyed to users in the same way that ‘client’ software is, so the same kinds of restrictions should apply. But it’s really not a restriction on use, it’s still a restriction on distribution.