I spent a while in this space. My critique from 3 years ago.
Even on the readability front alone, I don’t see this as much of an improvement.
Losing homoiconicity on top of that … well, there’s a reason all lisps look the way they do. :)
[Comment removed by author]
Indeed. My attraction to lisp is due entirely to syntax derived from the exclusive use of prefix expressions. For that, I’m willing to put up with a lot, including the lack of types.
I spent a while in this space. My critique from 3 years ago.
Even on the readability front alone, I don’t see this as much of an improvement.
Losing homoiconicity on top of that … well, there’s a reason all lisps look the way they do. :)
[Comment removed by author]
Indeed. My attraction to lisp is due entirely to syntax derived from the exclusive use of prefix expressions. For that, I’m willing to put up with a lot, including the lack of types.