1. 34

  2. 4

    Huh – slightly surprised to see it uses the higher-overhead 8b/10b instead of something denser like 128b/130b as employed in PCIe 3+. (And also that USB2 apparently has nothing of the sort at all, though I guess I don’t have much gut sense of the point at which those measures become necessary.)

    1. 5

      Wouldn’t 8b10b provide a lot more frequent transitions between 1 and 0 than 128b130b? Maybe USB wants high enough clock variance tolerances that it needs to guarantee transitions more frequently than 128b130b would?

      1. 4

        USB1.1 and USB2 use bit stuffing. https://www.embedded.com/bit-stuffing/

        1. 2

          I’d assume that the tolerances are way lower in PCIe (i. e. it doesn’t have to worry about people moving and bending cables while operating).