1. 20
  1.  

  2. 5

    I was working on a proposal for a talk like “User Experience of Command Line Tools” for O'Reilly’s design conference, but missed the deadline. :(

    I’d also like to see more studies of real-world codebases, and the tradeoffs made (stuff like Michael Abrash’s writing, as in http://blogs.valvesoftware.com/abrash/latency-the-sine-qua-non-of-ar-and-vr/). Annotated codebases that I’ve seen are a start, though they’re often not more than just comments on a line-by-line basis, whereas I’m more interested in why it was done that way and what else was tried/discarded.

    1. 4

      Have you written about CLI UX anywhere? I would like to subscribe to your newsletter, as this is something I’ve been thinking a lot about lately.

      1. 3

        I haven’t written it up yet (I’ve been mainly in “gathering” mode and wrote just enough for an abstract), wasn’t sure if anyone was interested, but using you as a proxy :), I’ll probably start putting something together. I’ll post it here once I’ve gotten it started.

    2. 4

      Would love software archaeology courses.

      1. 4

        You should check out the Architecture of Open Source Applications series. There’s a lot of great stuff in there, but I particularly liked the chapter on Warp from volume 3.

      2. 3

        Many of these are implementation-specific, which is usually not what Computer Science is about. The first one is okay, but I experienced most of that under a different name (which I now forget, but it was the course that used Scheme or Lisp for its projects).

        1. 3

          I am 100% going to propose the first (Unlearning OOP) and last (Programmer Obsessions). Not with those names, of course, but the same idea.