1. 33
  1.  

  2. 2

    “Why be Like Elm?”, is that a typo? Perhaps meant to be: “Why Do We Like Elm?”

    1. 6

      I read “Why be Like Elm?” roughly as “Why would you, NoRedInk, want to write your Haskell like you write your Elm?”

      1. 5

        It was intended as “Why would I, a programming language, aspire to be like Elm?”.

        A bit farfetched perhaps :).

        1. 3

          I don’t think so, because many of their libraries aim to bring Elm flavours into Haskell.

        2. 1

          How do you handle the tendency of Haskell code to be generic and monad-oriented, in contrast to Elm?