I applaud simplifying things, hopefully this will eventually make Qt software live longer. Every deviation from the norm risks making it more difficult to build a project 20 years from now.
When I first saw you had made your own build system, I was a bit worried, but it looks pretty robust at first glance.
I noticed that there isn’t any CI for this, or the build system, BUSY. Is that something you’d consider adding? I think it would help convincing people that you are serious about this.
I applaud simplifying things, hopefully this will eventually make Qt software live longer. Every deviation from the norm risks making it more difficult to build a project 20 years from now.
When I first saw you had made your own build system, I was a bit worried, but it looks pretty robust at first glance.
I noticed that there isn’t any CI for this, or the build system, BUSY. Is that something you’d consider adding? I think it would help convincing people that you are serious about this.
Thanks. Have you seen the specification (http://software.rochus-keller.ch/busy_spec.html)?
For some projects I have a logo, but it always takes a lot of time to select one. Do you have experience with CIs?