1. 5
  1. 3

    So Rust is stuck with <>/::<> while Go might be getting it right with []?

    Oh, the irony.

    1. 2

      I should have posted a link to https://groups.google.com/g/golang-nuts/c/7t-Q2vt60J8/m/daacBE2tBQAJ that expands the first post in the thread and makes reading easier. Can a moderator please update the post link to this URL?

      1. 5

        it seems to require a google account to read… too bad

        1. 2

          This one doesn’t require a google account (taken from HN):

          https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=topic/golang-nuts/7t-Q2vt60J8

      2. 1

        Good grief just pick something already.

        This is turning into a undergrad designing their first language.

        1. 3

          With the number of bad choices requiring huge transition phases a various well designed languages have had why rush now?

          1. 2

            Quite the opposite. An undergrad would have just picked something & run with it. It takes many years of painful experience to know that this is a very risky proposition.