1. 4
  1.  

  2. 2

    I’ve no intention to get into long debates about FP vs OOP, but that is not significantly different from the way Smalltalk programmers tend to develop. Defining and redefining classes in Smalltalk is at least as easy as types in the FP languages I’ve used.

    All of this is to agree with the gist of the post… I can identify with that overall flow and feel, whether it is a good static FP or a good dynamic OOP.