I used to love anand reviews, but I think they’ve lost track of the difference between comprehensive and filler. Do I need to be told that the back surface is unremarkable? How many times do I need to be told that dual core is not tri core and it’s different and there used to be three and now there’s two because there was an exception but now they’re back to two which shows that three was unusual because it’s not the same as two?

I always got the sense that Anand would have written his reviews even if nobody read them because he was excited to do it. The new batch of writers are more obviously doing this because they’re getting paid.

(I don’t think this was off topic, just disappointed in its quality.)