1. -2

  2. 5

    I did not see a link to Doug Zongker’s classic paper and presentation.

    1. 1

      Ok I just read the paper and the link I posted is clearly derivative as well as somewhat reductionist. Compared to the original work done by Zongker, this is a mere shadow. Also watched the talk and found the Q&A to really be something to chew on.

    2. 1

      I decided to post this mostly because my friend Richard showed it to me and I couldn’t stop laughing. By the time I got to the second diagram I was gasping for air. That brilliant mother clucker…

      1. 1

        More related work: https://www.scs.stanford.edu/~dm/home/papers/remove.pdf but I think from the date on the references that Zongker may be earlier than that February 2005-ish Mazieres/Kohler work (submitted and accepted at least once). Also related, but, shall we say, “more subtle”: Sokal’s Hoax