1. 19
  1.  

  2. 6

    The left hand side (menu) doesn’t look good on my screen - the:

    Hosted on GitHub Pages using the Dinky theme
    
    Logo thanks to @FiLis
    

    is “on top” of the last three, non-clickable, buttons.

    1. 1

      Should now be resolved.

    2. 6

      What information do I get from reading that instead of just reading the wikipedia pages?

      1. 1

        I have not done a full comparison do you happen to know?

      2. 3

        There’s not even a link to runbsd.info anywhere on that page…

        1. 1

          fixed :) Thank for bringing it up.

        2. 3

          Looks good, but needs an introduction with why you’d be interested in looking further - just giving the history tells me nothing really useful and would be much appropriate after a “why” section. Also the site doesn’t work well at all on an iPhone 5 sized screen. Good idea though, I hope it continues to improve and can be a good resource to send people interested in getting started.

          1. 1

            Thanks to @fcbsd, there’s a new page for BSD.

          2. 3

            Interesting project. Some potential problems I noticed:

            1. While NetBSD gets thorough coverage, the FreeBSD page has almost nothing despite it being most comparable to Linux in terms of features and performance. The section on runbsd.info would make readers think it’s just NetBSD with a speed boost. I believe it was also the dominant BSD in powering Internet servers.

            2. OpenBSD is known not just for security but minimalism, consistency, and auditing code more than adding it. Instead of info like that, the second paragraph just lists a pile of release dates and info. More than what was in NetBSD or FreeBSD sections as if OpenBSD’s release info is its most important attribute.

            3. The inconsistency on that continues with Dragonfly where you don’t mention release info. Although, you correctly focus on improved SMP and filesystem as key points in favor of Dragonfly.

            The site seems broken. As rjc said, I those words are super-imposed over the menu buttons where I had to guess the name of the link typing it in the URL. I mean, I could dig through source but your names were intuitive. I originally thought it was NoScript but allowing it has no fix.

            1. 2

              Hi Nick,
              Just to clarify, did you read the blog post on where the content for the runbsd.info came from?
              I mean that in the most sincerest sense, please don’t read that in a angry or flippant tone :)

              1. 1

                I went straight to runbsd.info. On the blog post (just read it), it says it was pulled off another post. That one appears to contain the same stuff. My critique at the content would still apply. Offers to take requests on changes. What am I missing or are you just saying I should put it in some pull requests? And similarly said with good intentions. :)

                1. 4

                  The content was put together for a talk given to a specific audience, which was a group of hardware enthusiasts who do not necessarily have an interest in software but may require an operating system.
                  The site is in no way complete and if there’s more on the NetBSD page currently it’s just that I could think of specific tools that would benefit someone made to use the software to get their job done.
                  The points you’ve raised above are absolutely correct but in my opinion are about the craftsmanship of the software, if you were standing in front of a group of people who are more interested in hardware, why would those thing be of interest to them versus say try NetBSD, it comes with cross compilation working out of the box and if you have to tinker with code, there’s a test framework so you can catch if any new mistakes into the system.
                  FreeBSD has support for ARMv8 & RISC-V and research ISA’s.
                  OpenBSD has these components that are used in many other operating systems so you don’t have to write your own.
                  DragonFly is experimenting in a new direction for SMP & file system.

                  Videos from the event are available here

                  1. 1

                    if you were standing in front of a group of people who are more interested in hardware

                    Hmm. Ok. I think I see what you mean now. I think I’d then focus (on top of ISA’s and portability) on resource requirements, what multi-core support was there, sound/graphics components, debugging support for drivers, and maybe cross-compiling but GCC probably got that handled. Is that being more on point for this crowd?

                    1. 3

                      It’s irrelevant now, as I said in the blog post: “This is no longer a constraint in this scenario and so will now move to cover things in a generic sense, allowing wider coverage of highlights in each operating system. There is a lot of room for improvement.”

            2. 2

              I know there may be other reasons, but I’d sort the different BSD’s alphabetically in the menu. Popularity doesn’t really matter imho, given I would be running Windows otherwise.

              1. 2

                It’s sorted chronologically and the text currently follows that order.

                1. 1

                  This should be fixed now, thanks to @fcbsd, can you confirm?

                  1. 1

                    Yeah, looks good!

                2. 2

                  Before I clicked, I knew it was going to use the “RUN DMC” logo!

                  Other variations:

                  1. 3

                    I like the RUIN DMCA one :) It seems that the logo was used also for a marathon (London?), I’ve been seeing Run $UKPOSTCODE t-shirts occasionally. First one I spotted was Run BS3 but the persons jacket was covering the 3, for a minute there I couldn’t believe my luck “we’re going mainstream, hipsters in London Fields are wearing Run BSD t-shirts”.

                  2. 1

                    Why this website? Iinformations related to the 4 BSD are really minimalistic.

                    1. 1

                      Rather than reply individual to the theme issues, I state here that I’ve filed 2 issues on the github page with the details. Now to actually fix it.