I’ve worked with people who started off in the seventies. Someone like that should have been included, someone who’s on the verge of retirement.
[Comment removed by author]
So our original, well-researched article with 3 interviews done with real people is spam? What wouldn’t be spam, out of interest?
I believe the objection here is that your sole engagement with this community, to date, is to link to your business. The quality is irrelevant.
Sorry that’s not correct. 7 posts, 3 about SQLizer.
I stand corrected - you have posted a link on astrophysics that’s not from your business.
3 posts from SQLizer, 3 posts from your other gig weared4, 1 (quite fascinating) bit of astrophysics.
To be clear, I’m not taking a position here on whether the content is spam; I’m trying to explain why some people are calling it that.
I’ve worked with people who started off in the seventies. Someone like that should have been included, someone who’s on the verge of retirement.
[Comment removed by author]
So our original, well-researched article with 3 interviews done with real people is spam? What wouldn’t be spam, out of interest?
I believe the objection here is that your sole engagement with this community, to date, is to link to your business. The quality is irrelevant.
Sorry that’s not correct. 7 posts, 3 about SQLizer.
I stand corrected - you have posted a link on astrophysics that’s not from your business.
3 posts from SQLizer, 3 posts from your other gig weared4, 1 (quite fascinating) bit of astrophysics.
To be clear, I’m not taking a position here on whether the content is spam; I’m trying to explain why some people are calling it that.