I’ve worked with people who started off in the seventies. Someone like that should have been included, someone who’s on the verge of retirement.
[Comment removed by author]
So our original, well-researched article with 3 interviews done with real people is spam? What wouldn’t be spam, out of interest?
I believe the objection here is that your sole engagement with this community, to date, is to link to your business. The quality is irrelevant.
Sorry that’s not correct. 7 posts, 3 about SQLizer.
I stand corrected - you have posted a link on astrophysics that’s not from your business.
3 posts from SQLizer, 3 posts from your other gig weared4, 1 (quite fascinating) bit of astrophysics.
To be clear, I’m not taking a position here on whether the content is spam; I’m trying to explain why some people are calling it that.