1. 13
  1.  

  2. 3

    The author made a YouTube video describing the approach that is pretty neat too.

    1. 2

      Far more beautiful than the title implies.

      1. 2

        The technical details are very interesting, but I find the results, aesthetically-speaking, horrible :-/

        1. 4

          The lines are too precise. With all that resolution available, they look intentional. With the pixel graphics your imagination fills in the details.

          Maybe some jitter and line width variation could help.