1. 21
  1.  

  2. 4

    I don’t use Lisp, but I know Platform.SH and Ori in particular. They’re great people and I am excited they are adding languages like this to the platform, it gives me some hope for first class Lua support someday. :)

    1. 3

      What’s so special about platform.sh that it charges 50$ for a tiny server. ?

      1. 5

        Well, based on the domain name, I assume it’s written entirely in Bash, so that probably takes some extra cycles.

        1. 2

          It’s not 50 USD for a server, but for a project. So if you had two “projects” (I’m guessing web sites/apps) it’d be 100 USD instead. I imagine the overhead is for if you don’t want to deal with AWS/Google yourself.

          Their pricing model reminds me of Webflow.

          1. 1

            It’s not exactly like that. There’s a little more provided to ‘project’ than just ‘a server’. The project model gets you an app (I think just one on the standard plan, but it can be more) connected to provisioned services (databases, search index, queues, whatever) and a git server and some storage. Within your project plan you get a certain number of environments, which are branches. (e.g. staging, feature branch etc.) When you branch you can clone the whole setup, services, data, etc. and everything can be driven via git So there is additional value and a different workflow compared to just provisioning some cloud servers.

            1. 2

              I think we are both saying the same thing :-)

              Their site isn’t very clear (your description confirms things that I’ve guessed at from their site) but it sounds like you get a lot for your 50 USD. They’re taking care of CloudFront, ELB/ALB, CodeCommit/CodePipeline, DynamoDB/RDS, ElasticSearch, SQS etc. for you. If you set it all up yourself you’d undoubtedly pay less to AWS per month, but then you’d have to operate it all yourself.

              For devs it sounds great if you don’t want to manage all that yourself (or don’t have a team that does it for you at work). It really does remind me of Webflow, which does a similar thing for content sites (i.e. they do everything for you including visual design tool, CMS, form creation & submission handling etc.).