I like OKRs but the author seems to not have grasped how the KRs work.
How so? Can you explain how you draw that conclusion?
Yes. [I should have done that originally.]
KRs are not supposed to read like sub-tasks; they should read like a claim that can be easily & deterministically evaluated to be true or false.
Using the author’s example, they would look something like this:
Same idea but notice the difference in how they’re stated.
I like OKRs but the author seems to not have grasped how the KRs work.
How so? Can you explain how you draw that conclusion?
Yes. [I should have done that originally.]
KRs are not supposed to read like sub-tasks; they should read like a claim that can be easily & deterministically evaluated to be true or false.
Using the author’s example, they would look something like this:
Same idea but notice the difference in how they’re stated.