1. 21
  1.  

  2. 5

    While I agree with others that the name could be better, this is really cool. I’ve wanted a Clojure with gradual typing and low-level compilation for a long time! I’ll be keeping an eye on this. :)

    1. 2

      Great. Imagine telling your CTO that you want to bring in this language called jank. I guess if you already love Clojure in your org, it won’t matter much what Clojure for LLVM is called.

      1. 1

        Kind of feel the same way… the name is off putting.