#2 - Almost all of those quotes are targeted at C++. And the ones not are targeted at Java. There are more than two OO languages out there. And yes, the two most widely used have critics. What a shock. I bet nobody talks smack about any other programming paradigm.
#5 - Types….this entry is just so dumb that there isn’t much you can say.
#6 - Not sure how this one is an OOP problem.
#7 - I don’t really like OOP design patterns but the author doesn’t make any kind of convincing argument as to why you, the reader, should have a problem with design patterns.
#8, #9, #10 - None of these are required when it comes to OOP.
Poor quality post.
#2 - Almost all of those quotes are targeted at C++. And the ones not are targeted at Java. There are more than two OO languages out there. And yes, the two most widely used have critics. What a shock. I bet nobody talks smack about any other programming paradigm.
#5 - Types….this entry is just so dumb that there isn’t much you can say.
#6 - Not sure how this one is an OOP problem.
#7 - I don’t really like OOP design patterns but the author doesn’t make any kind of convincing argument as to why you, the reader, should have a problem with design patterns.
#8, #9, #10 - None of these are required when it comes to OOP.