1. 6
  1.  

  2. 1

    I’ve only read the abstract, but it seems like an equally important question would be the time-to-fix for post-release bugs with code coverage vs without. My own experience is that bugs are easier to fix when the associated code has test coverage.

    1. 1

      Intuitively: along with bug fixing, refactoring and behavior-altering rewrites are also facilitated by good test coverage. To my mind, preventing bugs is not necessarily the main purpose. Nonetheless, the results in this study are very interesting.

      (See also the effect of JavaScript static typing on preventing bugs.)