1. 6

  2. 1

    It is missing check boxes for: readability, maintainability, efficiency, easy to learn, and probably more.

    The question I always ask is: “How is this language different from the other 30 to 50 languages invented this year, last year, the year before that, the year before before…”

    1. 2

      Those are more or less implied by some of the detailed boxes under “Unfortunately, your language (has/lacks):”. Providing specific details is more helpful than a blanket statement of “Your language is difficult to maintain”.