1. 20
    1. 9

      I’m quite happy that the MitM options didn’t make it into the standard.

      Though I’m missing encrypted SNI, I hope we get that soon.

      1. 3

        It was interesting to see the reason why encrypted SNI wasn’t included - too much complexity to achieve it.

      2. 3

        Regarding encrypted SNI, this Internet-Draft, last updated March 1, summarizes the proposals that appear to be furthest along.

    2. 2

      Does this mean the spec is finished and we can start seeing it used in applications/servers?

      1. 4

        If I understand the IETF, it means assuming nothing is found to be totally broken, there’ll only be editorial changes from here on out, no technical changes.