1. 8
  1.  

  2. 10

    Holy fuck, this is the biggest abuse of clickbait I’ve ever seen. Not only does it use dubious maths to arrive at the sum, but the author just randomly picks a 0.5% number out of nowhere!

    1. 1

      Exactly. For an established brand like this I’d expect people to retry (perhaps by phone). Also for cards expiring 2020 there is no bug :)

      1. 5

        @adtac I don’t think it’s that clickbaity. The title says “potentially”, and he also used 0.05% and not 0.5%, and though the number is still random, the implication isn’t too bad for napkin calculations for fun and no profit.

        @vii

        Exactly. For an established brand like this I’d expect people to retry (perhaps by phone).

        I think most people I know wouldn’t, including myself.