Holy fuck, this is the biggest abuse of clickbait I’ve ever seen. Not only does it use dubious maths to arrive at the sum, but the author just randomly picks a 0.5% number out of nowhere!
@adtac
I don’t think it’s that clickbaity. The title says “potentially”, and he also used 0.05% and not 0.5%, and though the number is still random, the implication isn’t too bad for napkin calculations for fun and no profit.
Holy fuck, this is the biggest abuse of clickbait I’ve ever seen. Not only does it use dubious maths to arrive at the sum, but the author just randomly picks a 0.5% number out of nowhere!
Exactly. For an established brand like this I’d expect people to retry (perhaps by phone). Also for cards expiring 2020 there is no bug :)
@adtac I don’t think it’s that clickbaity. The title says “potentially”, and he also used 0.05% and not 0.5%, and though the number is still random, the implication isn’t too bad for napkin calculations for fun and no profit.
@vii
I think most people I know wouldn’t, including myself.