1. 8
  1.  

  2. 19

    Some clarifications:

    • It’s not just the package name. The code contains many other crude “jokes”.
    • Some error messages that potentially bubble up to the end user contain insults.
    • The upstream developers don’t seem to have intention to change attitude.
    1. 5

      Some error messages that potentially bubble up to the end user contain insults.

      Honestly, this is the only point they need to make such a decision.

      1. 2

        OP should have linked to the actual Debian response instead of the phoronix spam. It’s much more informative.

      2. 10

        Debian has had situations like this in the past. The hot babe incident was more blatant:

        https://lwn.net/Articles/113644/

        Also reminds me of the Microsoft B1GB00B5 problem, especially since the weboob author has acknowledged the puerile reference.

        Edit: The Phoronix article is omitting a lot of the actual story. It’s worthwhile reading Debian anti-harassment’s team response:

        https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907199#47

        There were more problems with the package than the name. Commands had sexual overtones and there were homophobic slurs in the source code comments.

        1. 6

          I’m surprised this is regarded “harassment”, or not “respectful”. I do however agree that it should have been pulled just for being incredibly juvenile. I’m also surprised and disappointed by the associated forum comments. I’m generally strongly critical of SJW-type behaviour, but I don’t think this is SJW overreach. It’s reasonable to hold collaborators of a professional project to a professional standard, and jokes about boobs aren’t that.

          1. 1

            A reasonable decision if a distro is responsible for the software it makes available. I wonder if a program that, when running on a Linux computer in the nose of a nuclear missile, flies the nuke, could be accepted into Debian.

            1. -1

              If you know me personally, you’d be surprised to know that this actually has me torn.

              1. 5

                As it turns out, the project is way more problematic than just the name (which doesn’t sound all that horrible I guess). See comment.

                You can always count on Phoronix for “accurate” reporting :D