Mmmmm, data. I would’ve never thought to do something like this simply because I have no interest in snooping into what people are shortening. Really takes a mind that looks for “data mines” to realize something like this. Good article. Probably any day now until there’s a GitHub project that produces an updated list of unshortened URLs.
The court considers intent. After uncovering a dozen AT&T customer records, what purpose was served by enumerating a million more? Further, upon identifying information intended to remain private, what action was taken to either protect or disclose it?
Not anymore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weev gives details. However, the court didn’t test the substantive question of whether the law applies to scans of unprotected resources.
Mmmmm, data. I would’ve never thought to do something like this simply because I have no interest in snooping into what people are shortening. Really takes a mind that looks for “data mines” to realize something like this. Good article. Probably any day now until there’s a GitHub project that produces an updated list of unshortened URLs.
You don’t have to look too far. There’s already an Internet Archive project 301Works
Haha, awesome! Thank you for sharing, I’ll check it out later.
[Comment removed by author]
The court considers intent. After uncovering a dozen AT&T customer records, what purpose was served by enumerating a million more? Further, upon identifying information intended to remain private, what action was taken to either protect or disclose it?
Not anymore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weev gives details. However, the court didn’t test the substantive question of whether the law applies to scans of unprotected resources.