1. 13

  2. 5

    What a letdown to read all the detail only to read that they won’t post details on the very thing the article is about. (sighs) Probably should’ve been a one, paragraph post saying they had a new hash table, what its performance was, that they’re too burned out to describe it, and keep eye out for after the talk.

    1. 4

      The code is posted at the end, and the previous fastest hash post, linked at the beginning, is extremely informative as well.


      1. 1

        I somehow missed it. My mistake. Thanks for the link.