1. 2
  1. 1

    Seems like interviewing could be improved with judicious application of electrodes and eye trackers. (Satirical for now, but I’m a natural pessimist, and can imagine this gaining traction if there’s a sufficient power imbalance between the hirer and the candidate.)

    1. 1

      You just have to convince the candidates that they would be the ones doing well at such a test. ;)