1. 7
  1.  

  2. 4

    the author of that article seems to be entirely unaware that Internet communities and publishing existed before 2000, but I guess it makes for a better story / headline that way.

    1. 3

      I thought it is was Baby Cakes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9GoWGnFzGA

      1. 2

        The first sentence is the only one that mentions Forrest Gump. It’s been a while since I’ve seen the movie, so I don’t get it at all. Can anyone fill me in here?

        1. 7

          I think it’s because both were involved in important events and know/knew important or well-known people but they themselves remain largely unknown.

          It’s seems like a very weird way of describing anybody, but maybe it’s a common comparison in some circles.

          1. 1

            I thought it was both of them were earnest but still successful.