1. 21
  1.  

    1. 3

      For what it’s worth, I like the TOML configuration syntax since it’s so much more readable for me, and easier to understand compared to BIND, Unbound and other usual suspects. I guess the time has come for it to slowly start appearing in distro package repositories, Docker containers, etc.

      I’m going to give it a go starting from next week and try to replace Unbound with Hickory on my personal public DNS resolver. I’ll be in UAE for a month on business and I don’t like state governments interfering with my DNS resolution, so I’ve provisioned a public resolver instance in nearby Bahrain on AWS and put nginx in front of it for DNS over HTTPS. Will be a fun ride.

      1. 5

        Sounds like fun but it’s rarely considered wise to post online about crimes you plan to commit

        1. 1

          Daaamn, I’m busted.

          But then again, it’s just typical HTTPS traffic towards my personal domain using a TLD of a sovereign country (that just happens to be the same TLD this web site is using, btw). Surely the UAE government would take my word for it, right? Right?

          1. 1

            I saw a link the other day about someone tunneling through the great firewall by hiding traffic in a VPN disguised as a webmail portal.

      2. 2

        Very cool! I’ve been running ntpd-rs locally (on FreeBSD) recently as well.