1. 16
  1.  

  2. 5

    Minor typographic point:

    \Zeal\ (z[=e]l)

    This seems to be supposed to represent IPA (international phonetic alphabet), like you’d see in a dictionary, see here: “word” is noted as /wɜːd/. See those slashes? Those are regular slashes. Those are the slashes you are supposed to use. A backslash, as used by the zeal website, has pretty much no typographic purpose. It’s ugly and useless — that is why we use it as escape character, because no sane person would use it for anything. Especially not something important, such as a path separator (you know who you are). There is no reason you’d ever want to use a backslash in text.

    And even still, the slashes are meant to go around the IPA. So it should have been:

    Zeal /z[=e]l/

    I see this occuring more and more, especially non-english-speaking folks using backslashes where they should have used regular slashes. I blame this on a large software company that, for legacy reasons, chose them as path separator because otherwise they wouldn’t be able to properly parse command line arguments.

    See Backslash#Usage and IPA#Types of Transcription for more detail.

    1. 4

      Bizarrely, Merriam-Webster uses backslashes and disagrees with other dictionaries (which more often use /zil/ or /zi:l/), as well as (somewhat redundantly) using the primary stress sigil on a single-syllable word. (Just a tidbit found after a short investigation.)

      I’d also like to know if z[=e]l is written using a different standard of phonetic alphabet, as I’ve never seen that format before and would have no idea how to pronounce it.

    2. 2

      It’s an interesting idea. I tried to use REBL to walk through a datomic dB, but I couldn’t make it to work.

      1. 1

        I understand it’s a work in progress, but I don’t see what it’s supposed to do.

        What does it offer over a regular REPL or something like Slime?