1. 17
  1.  

  2. 10

    oh god what is this website? One of the subforums featured on the front page is “ClownWorld”, which is just straight up neo-nazi propaganda. I love dunking on Brave, but surely there’s a source that isn’t helping spread white supremacy?

    I found this alternate link on HN: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/brave-privacy-bug-exposes-tor-onion-urls-to-your-dns-provider/

    1. 8

      Thanks for finding an alternate link. I’ve swapped it in and banned that domain.

      @habibalamin If nobody linked to this dumpster fire of a site, we’d still have the CVE or browser’s own writeup/patch to link to.

    2. 3

      I didn’t mean to post to horrid content. I just posted the link I did because that’s the source material. The Bleeping Computer link is just a news posting about the source material.

      Sorry about that! I wish Ramble wasn’t so icky.

      1. 2

        There’s some gross shit going on with at least the comment section of that site. This post includes Brave’s confirmation of the issue and omits the antisemitic slurs in the discussion.

        1. 2

          That still links to Ramble, I’d prefer https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/brave-privacy-bug-exposes-tor-onion-urls-to-your-dns-provider/ which links to a post on a security subreddit instead.

          Also, can we block links to Ramble? If people submitted links to Stormfront or 8chan, we wouldn’t want those posted, right?

          1. 3

            Also, can we block links to Ramble?

            If what @hoistbypetard says about this being the primary source is true, it seems a bit silly to not allow it.

            If everyone decided to not link to or cover from taboo or noxious sources, you wouldn’t even have a secondary source to draw from.

            And not giving people credit for their work is just wrong, no matter who they are.

            I understand it can be distressing to run into these sources in a cavalier way, but there’s a more balanced solution to that, which is trigger warnings (maybe some red lobste.rs tags for different triggers).

            @pushcx: see suggestion in paragraph above.

            1. 2

              You’re not wrong. I posted the first one I turned up that wasn’t ramble, had the official confirmation and seemed like a reasonable write-up.

              FWIW bleeping computer links to the ramble post as well, with only reddit as a layer of indirection.

              The fact that this was discovered and reported by the operator of ramble probably means any coverage of it that attributes it appropriately will also just be a couple of clicks away.

              1. 1

                hahaha, you’re right, I didn’t even look at the URL in the Reddit post. My bad. At least it’s another layer of indirection? Bleh.