1. 22

  2. 7

    It helps to read the intro here! :^) I skimmed to the questions without reading the intro first, and was thoroughly confused.

    1. 2

      I was thoroughly confused even after reading the intro. The whole article made little sense.

      1. 2

        The best way to give a question rigor is to create it from a rigorous algorithm.

        Yes, I skipped this line, so while reading I was wondering if I actually really suck at Python… I thought I knew what I was doing, until I was stumped by these questions.

      2. 5

        An old piece of mine that I recently rediscovered. This was back before I got deep into history and formal methods and was mostly writing silly Python satires. Apologies for the medium link; it’s also before I realized writing on my own blog was better. I should probably move it over :/


        1. 4

          I was literally giggling while reading this. Well done!

          1. 3

            It reads like an AI taught to write medium posts. I sense a new technologically generated mode of satire on the horizon.