1. 11
    1. 15

      It appears that this release will run arbitrary JVM bytecode using the system JDK, if included in a Blu-Ray ISO: git.videolan.org As far as I can tell, it uses a SecurityManager to attempt to sandbox. Here’s a summary of the efficacy of this approach: https://tersesystems.com/blog/2015/12/29/sandbox-experiment/

      I don’t see any information on even a cursory security audit of this component. Is this alarming to anyone else?

      1. 5

        Is this alarming to anyone else?

        They put Java into some standard for Blu-Ray. A lot of places and things were using it thanks to the big, marketing push back in the day. Then, to use that or part of it you need to run Java. As usual with Java, using it is a security risk. This kind of thing happening in tech or standards designed by big companies for reasons other than security is so common that it doesn’t even alarm me anymore. I just assume some shit will happen if it involved codecs or interactive applications.

        Old, best practice is to run the Internet apps and untrustworthy apps on dedicated box. Netbooks got pretty good. Substitute VM if trading for cost/convenience. Mandatory access control next with low assurance. You’re totally toast next.

      2. 5

        Like @nickpsecurity said, it is used in lot of places so not including it is same as raising middlefinger to your users (they cannot watch their expensive discs) and they go and use some other application, which probably is even less secured. We really cannot make ordinary users stop wanting to use their goods because now we know that they are insecure. Having secure system does not matter if no one uses it.

    2. 3

      I haven’t used VLC for ages, and even back then I preferred MPC-HC (on Windows) or mplayer2 (on Linux). I’m happy mpv user (on Windows and Linux) since its very beginning.

      Are there any users who use both mpv and VLC often, and could shed a light what VLC has that mpv cannot provide them?

      1. 2

        Opening videos straight from the browsers “open with dialogue”. Using subtitles with VLC is more convenient for me. Few years ago I used VLC more when mpv had problems with some matroska containers, don’t know if this is problem anymore.

      2. 2

        VLC is a bit more Windows-friendly. But on unix, I use gnome-mpv.

      3. 1

        Do you use vanilla mpv or some kind of front-end with it?

        1. 2

          No GUI front-ends. I’m mostly keyboard-oriented user, but mpv’s built-in OSC is actually good too, so sometimes I operate with mouse in mpv window.

    3. 1

      Windows 64-bit link is broken.

      1. 1

        I couldn’t find any mentions of the 64-bit version so I had to look on their download site to grab one.